1. What will happen on August 5th: “With Mr Ahmadinejad due to be sworn in for a second term on 5 August, the government has a tough choice. If it makes concessions in the face of continuing demonstrations, that would be a humiliating climb down. If, as seems more likely, it clings to power, it will do so as a wounded regime whose credibility is ebbing away.”
2. Threatening Ahmadinejad Over His Appointments and and Forced Resignations: “The Islamic Society of Engineers, a political group close to parliamentary speaker Ali Larijani, warned in an open letter to Ahmadinejad that he could suffer the same fate as Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadegh, who was deposed in 1953 in a CIA-backed coup with the acquiescence of the clergy. The letter also cites the experience of President Abolhassan Bani-Sadr, who was ousted in 1981 and fled the country after he fell out with the Islamic Republic’s founder, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. Both leaders had been elected by huge margins. ‘It seems you want to be the sole speaker and do not want to hear other voices,’ the group’s letter says, noting that recent actions by Ahmadinejad have frustrated his own supporters. ‘Therefore it is our duty to convey to you the voice of the people.'”
3. The 40 Day of Mourning for Neda’s Death is Approaching: “In response to the permit denial, Mousavi’s supporters began circulating routes for unauthorized marches and candlelight vigils to mark the religiously significant 40th day after the deaths of those killed at June 20 demonstrations, including Neda Agha-Soltan, whose slaying, captured on videotape, drew worldwide condemnation.”
4. Ahmadinejad’s Last Row: “Ahmadinejad had initially appointed Rahim-Masha’i as the first vice president, a post he resigned from after the Leader of the Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei, sent a handwritten note to the office of the president on the issue. However, Rahim-Masha’i was later named the head of the presidential office, sparking a fresh row between Ahmadinejad and his supporters and opponents.”
5. 140 Detainees Freed: “Iran today responded to growing criticism over political detainees by freeing 140 inmates incarcerated in its most notorious jail following the recent post-election upheavals. The prisoners were released from Tehran’s Evin prison after MPs inspected the facility, where hundreds of opposition politicians, activists and protesters have been held following protests over President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s bitterly disputed re-election. The move followed the closure of another detention centre where human rights groups say torture led to several deaths. Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, ordered the closure of Kahrizak prison on Tehran’s southern outskirts because it ‘lacked the standards’ to maintain detainees’ rights, officials said. Ayatollah Mahmoud Hashemi Shahroudi, urged officials to free inmates not suspected of serious offences. Some 150 political prisoners remain inside, according to official figures, including prominent supporters of the reformist candidate, Mir Hossein Mousavi, who claims last month’s presidential election was stolen from him.”
6. Iraqi Forces Raid Mujahideen Base: “A raid by Iraqi troops on a camp housing members of an exiled Iranian opposition group has left four people dead and more than 400 wounded. The Iraqi army had stormed Camp Ashraf to the north of Baghdad on Tuesday, but were forced to call in riot police to quell the violence when residents tried to resist. Iraq’s defence ministry said the offensive against the People’s Mujahedeen base was justified under a security agreement signed by Baghdad and Washington in November. ‘It’s our territory and it’s our right to enter, to impose Iraqi law on everybody,’ General Mohammed Askari, the defence ministry spokesman told Al-Arabiya television.”
7. Professor Juan Cole on the anti-MKO Raid: “Now that US troops have ceased their independent patrols in Iraqi cities, the government of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki has decided to move against the group. The Ministry of the Interior security forces are alleged to have been deeply infiltrated by the Badr Corps of the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq, a leading party in parliament and ally of al-Maliki that was formed in Iran by Iraqi expatriates under the auspices of Ayatollah Khomeini. Badr in turn was from the 1980s through 2003 essentially a unit of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps. Likely the victory of the hard liners and the IRGC in Iran’s struggle over the outcome of the June 12 presidential election has put them in a strong position to ask their Iraqi counterparts and former colleagues to move against the MEK.”
8. Ahmadinejad and Khamenei Continue Their Differences: “In the final days before President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s inauguration next week, splits among the country’s conservative elite have become increasingly conspicuous. Sometimes portrayed as a lackey for Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, he appears to be jockeying for power and authority – publicly defying Ayatollah Khamenei, sacking his intelligence minister less than a week before his Cabinet would have been dissolved anyway, and angering fellow conservatives by pressing for the broadcast of confessions forced from political prisoners.”
9. Time Magazine’s Photo Essay on Iran, before and after the elections: See it here.
10. Tweets, Lies, and Videotape: Click here to read how a blogger deciphers fact from fiction.
1. Ahmadinejad himself is a member of Islamic Society of Engineers. I don’t get why the article wouldnt mention that? I think the western media just likes to exagerate things. I mean how much difference can these conservative groups really have? These articles are just looking for drama.
2. Video of the MKO raid http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQi6pE_VdDk
funny the hypocrites are even chanting god is great
You see ALi, in the west. They see differences in iran as weakness. THey want to portray any diffence of opinion in Iran to be a challenge to the system. In fact the system is made up of differneces of opinions balancing each other out. It no secret Ahmadenijad has many opponents in the “conservative” camp. In fact, both Khamenie and and espically Ahmedinjad dont really belong to the conservative camp. Ahmeninjad and his backers are really a new dyanamic that has entered the Iranian power system. And this has made a lot of people, both reform and conservatives very uneasy. Ahmedinjad previous term was restricted and criticised more then any other presidency by the so called conservative forces. Maybe thats what he has so much support, wich was evident on the election day. LIke really if had rigged the election.. why would he defy Khamenie wishes over the vice president. He probably feels hey I won a majority of votes.. and my presidency powers allow me to appoint who i want? who are they to say Who i can and not appoint. I mean seriousl, he been resticted more then Khatami ever was.. and Khatamis is suppossed to be on the “other side”
July 29, 2009
US agency mistranslated Iran election report
CJ Harwood a.k.a. Warlaw compares the BBC Monitoring’s translation of the of the Guardian Council report on election irregularities in Iran with the U.S. Open Source Center’s translation, and finds a major discrepancy:
The U.S. OSC file silently omits text, the smoking gun, the number of accredited election observers, ID cards, issued to 40,676 observers requested by Mir Hossein Mousavi (Mirhoseyn Musavi) and issued to 13,506 observers requested by Mehdi Karroubi (Mehdi Karrubi), Mousavi’s ally. …
Warlaw concludes from this:
The signatures of these, their own observers, on the ballot count forms on the day, and their subsequent silence, and the silence of Musavi and Karrubi on their behalf, their failure to challenge any of the published ballot box counts, constitutes their certification, that every single ballot box count they observed, the published ballot count is accurate, that’s at least 89% of the 45,692 total ballot boxes. And maybe all of them, some polling stations had more than one ballot box and so some observers presumably certified more than one box.
More here
And the original, Farsi-language version of the Guardian Council report is here and see this Gozaresh too
http://www.iranaffairs.com/iran_affairs/
Aza Azast Emrooz, ROOOZEH Azast Emroooz; Iranieh bagheyrat sahen Azast Emrooz.
Alijooon, fekr konam to be iranieh beegheyrat bishtar shabihi ke daree injoori az in Hamaleh dictator defah mikoni beghayrat.
Western understanding that Ahmadinejad is a tool of the clerical leadership could not be more wrong. It was Ahmadinejad who campaigned against some of the clerical elite.
The troubles that have followed the Iranian presidential elections have been generally misread by the Western press and policymakers. What we have witnessed was not a frustrated East European-style ‘colour revolution’; nor was presidential candidate Mir Hussain Mousavi’s movement an uprising of liberal Westernised sympathisers against the principles of the Iranian Revolution – albeit there were surely some who are hostile to the Revolution amongst his supporters.
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/articles/39/Iran_revolution_is_not_about_to_implode.html
http://www.asriran.com/fa/pages/?cid=79667
http://www.asriran.com/fa/pages/?cid=79669
http://kashanhami.blogfa.com/post-807.aspx